摘要
2021年五月乍然失控的台灣疫情,讓大學進入緊急遠距教育,面臨前所未有大規模的全校遠距教學經驗。因此,本研究欲先藉由文獻,探索一年以來全球高等教育在 COVID-19 下所面臨的學習問題與寶貴經驗;其次,針對南臺科技大學機械系,設計老師與學生課堂對應式問卷,相互參照師生在同樣時空環境中,對遠距教學不同的經歷與反應。從質性資料顯示,多數學生對突然實施的六周遠距教學,從一開始擁抱自由與解放,很快發現學習壓力變大,因素包括在家學習容易分心、作業增加、線上溝通相對困難等。教師表示在隔著螢幕面對學生時,對學習狀態、評量公平性、軟硬體使用、不易溝通等表示憂心。意見量性問題的統計結果顯示:學生整體達中高度的滿意;教師則降為中至中高的程度。5個大項目中,學生最滿意的順序為資源、同步遠距教學、期末評量、成效、學校設備;教師之順序則是把學校設備提前至第二位。總之,師生對於「學習/教學資源」的滿意度都是最高,雖然仍有學生因為只能使用手機上課(6%受測者)、電腦不佳或家中無網路而無法全力以赴,呈現出資源不公對線上學習的侷限。再者,學習/教學成效都是敬陪末座,顯示師生在六週期間雖已能掌握同步遠距教學,但溝通不適應、軟硬體條件等困難,多還是希望回到熟悉可靠的實體教學。最後,師生在期末評量、成效、聽課率等意見分歧,且是老師遠低於學生,呈現出一個教室(實體或虛擬的)、兩個世界(師生觀感差很多)的現象。本研究提出數位新住民與數位原住民如何相互理解與共存、師生對立的根源、以學生為中心的教學等三者,作為教師反思的角度。文中除了由大學教師和學生的意見,來診斷 COVID-19 流行期間遠距學習的現實,也在結語針對學生、老師與學校,提出可能有助於改善後疫情時代的建言。
關鍵詞:緊急遠距教育、新冠肺炎、高等教育、數位學習
Abstract
The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan in May 2021 forced universities to enter emergency distance education and face an unprecedented large-scale distance teaching experience. Accordingly, this research intends to use the literature to first explore the learning problems and valuable experiences faced by global higher education under COVID-19 in the past year. Secondly, for the mechanical department at Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, a corresponding questionnaire was designed for professors and students to cross-reference the different experiences and responses of professors and students to distance education at the same time and in the same class environment. Qualitative data shows that most students embraced freedom and liberation in the beginning of the sudden implementation of the six-week distance education, while they soon discovered that the pressure of learning had become greater. Factors for such disturbance include easy distraction at home, increased assignments, and relatively difficult online communication, etc. Professors indicated that when facing students across the screen, they expressed concern about learning status, fairness of assessment, use of hardware and software, and difficulty in on-line communication. The statistical results of opinion quantitative questions show that the students are satisfied at a medium-to-high overall level, while the professors show lower satisfaction at a medium or medium-to-high level. Among the five categories, the most satisfactory one for the students is resources, followed by synchronized remote education, final assessment, efficacy, and school equipment; for the professors, school equipment advances to the second place. In summary, the professors and students have the highest satisfaction with "learning/teaching resources,” even though there are still students who cannot fully participate in classes, given that they can only use mobile phones to attend classes (6% of the testees), their computers are poor, or they have no access to the Internet at home. This shows how unequal resources access and limitations of to online learning for students. Furthermore, the efficacy of learning/teaching is the least satisfactory, showing that although the professors and students have mastered synchronous remote education in the six weeks, most of them still prefer to return back to the familiar and reliable face-to-face classroom education, owing to the difficulties in communication, hardware and software conditions, etc. In addition to the opinions of the professors and students that help disclose the reality of distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study concludes with suggestions for students, professors, and universities that may help in the post-pandemic era.
Keywords: Remote Distance Learning, COVID-19 Pandemic, Higher Education, Digital Learning